|
The summary group financial statements have been derived from the audited group
financial statements. The directors of the company take full responsibility for the
preparation of the summary group financial statements and that the financial
information has been correctly derived and are consistent in all material respects with
the underlying audited group financial statements. The summary group financial
statements for the year ended 31 December 2020 have been audited by our joint
auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. and SizweNtsalubaGobodo Grant Thornton Inc.,
who have expressed an unmodified opinion thereon. The auditors also expressed an
unmodified opinion on the group financial statements from which the summary group
financial statements were derived. A copy of the auditors’ report on the group financial
statements is available for inspection at the company’s registered office or can be
downloaded from the company’s website: www.mtn.com/investors/financial-reporting/annual-results, together with the financial statements identified in the auditors’ report. |
|
MTN Group Limited (the company) carries on the business of investing in the
telecommunications industry through its subsidiary companies, joint ventures,
associates and related investments. |
|
The summary group financial statements are prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the JSE Limited Listings Requirements for preliminary financial
statements and the requirements of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008 applicable to
summary financial statements. The summary financial statements were prepared in
accordance with the framework concepts and the measurement and recognition
requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the South
African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA) Financial Reporting Guides as
issued by the Accounting Practices Committee (APC) and the Financial
Pronouncements as issued by the Financial Reporting Standard Council (FRSC), and
to also, as a minimum, contain the information required by IAS 34 Interim Financial
Reporting.
The accounting policies applied in the preparation of the group financial statements
from which the summary group financial statements were derived, are in terms of IFRS
and are consistent with those accounting policies applied in the preparation of the
previous group financial statements, unless otherwise stated.
The summary group financial statements should be read in conjunction with the group
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020, which have been prepared
in accordance with IFRS. A copy of the full set of the audited group financial statements
is available for inspection from the Company Secretary at the registered office of the
company or can be downloaded from the company’s website: www.mtn.com/investors/
financial-reporting/annual-results. |
|
The accounting policies applied in the preparation of the group financial statements
from which the summary group financial statements are derived, are in terms of IFRS
and are consistent with those accounting policies applied in the preparation of the
previous consolidated Annual Financial Statements except as described below.
The Group changed its accounting policy with regards to the method applied in
determining the amount of foreign currency translation reserves to be reclassified to
profit or loss on disposal of a foreign operation during the current financial year. Refer
to note 23 for details.
A number of amendments to accounting pronouncements are effective from 1 January
2020, but they do not have a material effect on the Group’s summary financial
statements. |
|
On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organisation officially declared the novel
coronavirus, COVID-19, a pandemic. Governments across the world have taken
extreme measures to curb the spread of the virus by introducing various forms of
social distancing, lockdown regimes and forms of monetary and fiscal stimulus. These
measures impacted the financial position of individuals, small and medium-sized
businesses as well as corporates to varying degrees, thereby significantly impacting
economies across the Group’s footprint.
The effects of COVID-19, and other macro developments, have also increased financial
risks such as exchange rate volatility, economic growth and capital flows in the Group’s
markets. During the past year, credit ratings agencies have downgraded sovereign
credit ratings in two of the Group’s largest markets, South Africa and Nigeria. The
Group continues to monitor these developments, assess the implications and manage
its responses in order to mitigate the related risks.
Amid the nearer-term risks and uncertainties of the impact of COVID-19 on markets,
the Group remains focused on preservation of cash and maintaining a healthy liquidity
position and strengthening its operational and financial position. In this regard it has
implemented cost control measures, focusing on critical expenses and enhanced
oversight of expenditure that support margin management and liquidity across the
business.
With the effects of COVID-19 being felt around the globe, there is also an impact on the
telecommunications sector. The restrictions placed on movement resulted in people
spending more time at home for work and leisure which resulted in the use of higher
amounts of data. This has been the impact in all our regions whereby revenue has
increased in local currency.
For the year ended 31 December 2020, there has been direct and indirect financial
effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlight the following relevant
disclosures provided in the notes to the Annual Financial Statements which include the
effects of the pandemic:
- During the past year, the Group has continued to provide telecommunication
services across its footprint as an essential service. The Group’s various revenue
streams per operation are disclosed in the operating segments (refer to note 8).
There has been revenue growth in network services resulting from strong growth in
data revenue, digital and fintech services and interconnect. Conversely, revenue
from sale of devices and roaming services have slowed due to the economic strain
placed on our customers and the lockdown regimes. The resilience of the national
networks, the headroom available on the networks and the allocation of temporary
additional spectrum enabled the Group to meet the surge in data volume driven by
work from home protocols and social distancing.
- The Group’s capital expenditure (capex) focus is to ensure the resilience and
capacity of its networks, which have been maintained despite disruptions in the
supply chain and challenges in rolling out coverage under lockdown rules and the
Group’s emphasis on liquidity for the period. As lockdown regulations lifted in our
markets towards the end of the year, the Group was able to resume a more regular
rollout of network investment as restrictions on movement and logistical bottlenecks
have eased. This enabled increased headroom in our networks, notably in South
Africa and Nigeria among our larger markets.
- Liquidity management remained a focus during this period. As at 31 December
2020 the Group had access to undrawn borrowings of R33,3 billion (December
2019: R33,8 billion) as disclosed in note 13.4. Holdco1 cash balances including
restricted cash and current investments was R20,6 billion as at 31 December 2020.
Year to date we have successfully
fast-tracked and closed R18,2 billion in funding
to mitigate refinance risk around upcoming maturities. The Group also concluded
the sale of its Ghana InterCo and Uganda InterCo tower investments for a
consideration of R8,8 billion and continued to pay its final dividend in respect of its
2019 financial year in April 2020.
- The financial impact of the crisis has put pressure on post-paid customers and the
Group’s enterprise business unit. The following table reflects the movements for the
period related to credit risk:
| |
31 December
2019 |
Movement |
|
|
|
|
| Trade receivables and contract assets gross carrying amount |
|
|
|
| – MTN Group |
R22 666 million |
R21 081 million |
8% |
| Expected credit loss allowance |
|
|
|
| – MTN Group |
R3 637 million |
R2 709 million |
34% |
| Average ECL/Impairment ratio |
|
|
|
| – MTN Group |
16,0% |
12,9% |
3,1 |
| Impairment and write down of trade receivables and contract assets – MTN Group |
R2 169 million |
R729,1 million |
197% |
| Impairment and write down of trade receivables |
|
|
|
| – MTN Nigeria |
R209 million |
R9,7 million |
2 055% |
| Impairment and write down of trade receivables and contract assets – MTN South Africa |
R1 869,3 million |
R629,7 million |
197% |
- The Group’s exposure and management of credit risk relating to its customers as
well as its exposure relating to cash and cash equivalents and Mobile Money (MoMo)
deposits placed with banks are provided in note 13. The Group has assessed the
potential impairment on cash balances and MoMo deposits due to the negative
impact of the pandemic on financial institutions. The nature of the bank balances
and MoMo deposits are largely short term in nature comprising mainly of current
accounts and call deposits. Given the significant actions taken by central banks to
improve liquidity through monetary and fiscal interventions, the Group’s expected
credit losses (ECLs) on cash balances and MoMo deposits remained immaterial.
- Significant movements in currencies expose the Group to foreign currency gains
and losses and also impact the Group’s translation of its results into its rand
presentation currency. The Group recognised net foreign exchange losses of
R4,5 billion (December 2019: R2,4 billion loss). In addition, the Group recognised a
foreign currency translation gain in the statement of comprehensive income on
converting the net assets of its foreign operations. The Group’s foreign exchange
gains and losses recognised in the income statement are provided in note 10 and
the income statement sensitivity to exchange rates is provided in note 13.5.2.
Exchange rates used in the conversion of the Group’s results are provided in
note 18.
- The severe impact of the pandemic on oil producing economies such as Nigeria
resulted in pressure on the availability of foreign currency and limited the Group’s
ability to repatriate dividends. The Group continued to manage sensitivities of
variability in cash flows on its debt gearing at a head office level. Holding company
debt gearing levels increased during the period as dividend flows were restricted
and the amounts in transit have been disclosed as restricted cash.
- The carrying values in a number of the Group’s smaller operations and an
investment in a joint venture exceeded their recoverable amounts during 2020,
which resulted in impairments recognised against the goodwill of MTN Yemen, MTN Liberia and MTN Guinea-Bissau and an impairment in an investment in joint venture
– Middle East Internet Holding S.A.R.L (MEIH). Further details of the entities are
provided in the note relating to impairment of goodwill (note 9.2) and investment in
joint venture (note 9.1).
- The Group’s valuation of its investment in IHS Holdings Limited (IHS) is based on
international tower industry multiples relevant at 31 December 2020. In February
2020, IHS completed the acquisitions of approximately 1 600 towers from Zain in
Kuwait and approximately 2 300 towers from Cell Site Solutions in Brazil, Peru and
Columbia. For the current year, IHS continued to operate under COVID-19 conditions
and grew operationally in all markets. However, the macroeconomic environment,
particularly in Nigeria, is impacted by the drop in oil prices and devaluation of the
Nigerian naira following the effects of COVID-19. Given the market conditions, a
combined liquidity and macro discount of 30% (2019: liquidity discount of 10%) has
been applied. The fair value was calculated based on unobservable market inputs
including tower industry earnings multiples which dropped to between 10x to 13x
(December 2019: 10x to 14x). The sensitivities to the fair value estimations are
provided in note 13.2.
- There have been no major impacts on leases and their related accounting impacts
as a result of COVID-19. With telecommunications being treated as an essential
service in most economies, our operations have continued to provide services to
customers. The Group has not been granted rent concessions or COVID-19 related
amendments to lease arrangements. Similarly, the increase in teleworking has
resulted in an increased demand for network capacity to accommodate traffic.
- The Group is not only focused on managing the risks brought about by COVID-19,
but also on the opportunities it creates in the accelerated digitalisation it has brought
about. The Group is well positioned to benefit from this evolution, especially given its
focus on growth in data, digital and financial services businesses in the execution of
its strategy.
- The Group provided ongoing support through the MTN Global Staff Emergency Fund
for employees and Y’ello Hope packages for our customers, communities and other
stakeholders. The extensive interventions that have been implemented are expected
to continue to safeguard the sustainability of the business, its people and its
customers in the prevailing challenging environment. The Group provided
government relief funds, personal protective equipment, healthcare support
and contributions to food security initiatives through its foundations. Across
the footprint numerous websites have been zero-rated to provide access to
education portals to enable on-going learning and health related information. In
countries like South Africa and Ghana, the Group has also supported contact tracing
initiatives to fight the spread of COVID-19.
- On 27 January 2021, MTN announced that it will be donating US$25 million to
support the African Union’s COVID-19 vaccination programme. The donation will
help secure COVID-19 vaccines for health workers across the continent. MTN will
recognise an expense and related cash outflow for the donation in the 2021 financial
year.
- Details of other events after the reporting period are set out in relevant notes within
these annual financial statements.
|
|
|
| 6.1 |
MTN SA revenue recognition |
| |
On 1 May 2020, MTN SA’s new long-form roaming agreement (Phase 2 agreement)
with Cell C became effective.
Based on Cell C’s liquidity issues, the Group has assessed that it is not probable that it
will receive the consideration to which it is entitled under the Phase 2 agreement, and
therefore the agreement does not meet the definition of a contract for revenue
recognition purposes in terms of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (IFRS 15). As a result, MTN SA did not recognise all revenue accrued on satisfied
performance obligations during the year. Revenue was only recognised on completed
services based on the non-refundable consideration received.
MTN SA recorded revenue of R1 992 million from Cell C during the year ended
31 December 2020. As at 31 December 2020, R525 million of revenue in relation to
satisfied performance obligations remains unrecognised.
Cell C continues to work on its recapitalisation and liquidity challenges. When Cell C
has been adequately recapitalised and starts paying significantly all the amounts due
to MTN, there will be a change in the Group’s accounting treatment of Cell C roaming
revenues back to an accounting methodology of recognising revenue as performance
obligations are satisfied. |
|
The financial statements (including comparative amounts) of the Group entities whose
functional currencies are the currencies of hyperinflationary economies are adjusted
in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.
The Group has classified the economies of Syria, South Sudan, Sudan and Iran as
hyperinflationary effective 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020 respectively.
In May 2020, MTN Syria was classified as a disposal Group held for sale (note 21) and
was remeasured to its fair value less costs to sell and the Group has therefore
discontinued adjusting MTN Syria’s net assets for hyperinflation from this date
onwards.
The economy of Iran was assessed to be hyperinflationary effective 1 January 2020,
and hyperinflation accounting was applied for the current financial year. Upon first
application of hyperinflation, prior period gains of R3 677 million were recognised
directly in equity.
The impact of hyperinflation on the segment analysis is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Revenue
Rm |
Operating
profit/(loss)
Rm |
Capex
Rm |
| Syria |
(669) |
124 |
(139) |
| Sudan |
3 429 |
233 |
507 |
| South Sudan (included in other SEAGHA) |
165 |
61 |
26 |
| |
2 925 |
418 |
394 |
| Major joint venture – Irancell |
(2 312) |
(1 629) |
(121) |
| |
2019 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Revenue
Rm |
Operating
profit/(loss)
Rm |
Capex
Rm |
| Syria |
– |
(250) |
– |
| Sudan |
626 |
(120) |
106 |
| South Sudan (included in other SEAGHA) |
279 |
54 |
109 |
| |
905 |
(316) |
215 |
| Major joint venture – Irancell |
– |
(621) |
– |
|
|
The Group has identified reportable segments that are used by the Group Executive
Committee Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) to make key operating decisions,
allocate resources and assess performance. The reportable segments are largely
grouped according to their geographic locations and reporting lines to the CODM.
The Group’s underlying operations are clustered as follows:
- South Africa;
- Nigeria;
- South and East Africa and Ghana (SEAGHA);
- West and Central Africa (WECA); and
- Middle East and North Africa (MENA).
South Africa and Nigeria comprise the segment information for the South African and
Nigeria-based cellular network services providers respectively.
The SEAGHA, WECA and MENA clusters comprise segment information for operations
in those regions which are also cellular network services providers in the Group.
Subsequent to year-end, the Group redefined its reporting segments from SEAGHA to
SEA with Ghana being included in WECA.
Operating results are reported and reviewed regularly by the CODM and include items
directly attributable to a segment as well as those that are attributed on a reasonable
basis, whether from external transactions or from transactions with other Group
segments.
A key performance measure of reporting profit for the Group is CODM EBITDA. CODM
EBITDA is defined as earnings before finance income and finance costs (which
includes gains or losses on foreign exchange transactions and a loss on revision of
cash flows from a joint venture), tax, depreciation and amortisation, and is also
presented before recognising the following items:
- impairment of joint venture and goodwill (note 9);
- net monetary gain resulting from the application of hyperinflation;
- share of results of associates and joint ventures after tax (note 11);
- hyperinflation (note 7);
- tower sale profits;
- gain on disposal/dilution of investment in associate and joint venture (note 19);
- gain on disposal of subsidiary; and
- impairment loss on remeasurement of non-current assets held for sale (note 21).
These exclusions have remained unchanged from the prior year, apart from impairment
loss on remeasurement of the non-current assets held for sale.
Irancell proportionate results are included in the segment analysis as reviewed by the
CODM and excluded from reported results for revenue, CODM EBITDA and capex due
to equity accounting for joint ventures. The results of Irancell in the segment analysis
exclude the impact of hyperinflation accounting.
| REVENUE |
|
Network
services
Rm |
|
Mobile
devices
Rm |
|
Interconnect
and
roaming
Rm |
| 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| South Africa |
|
29 639 |
|
8 449 |
|
3 481 |
| Nigeria |
|
49 054 |
|
294 |
|
5 732 |
| SEAGHA |
|
23 485 |
|
332 |
|
1 659 |
| Ghana |
|
11 648 |
|
120 |
|
749 |
| Uganda |
|
5 570 |
|
53 |
|
437 |
| Other SEAGHA |
|
6 267 |
|
159 |
|
473 |
| WECA |
|
20 107 |
|
183 |
|
2 581 |
| Cote d’lvoire |
|
5 697 |
|
47 |
|
1 101 |
| Cameroon |
|
5 118 |
|
46 |
|
459 |
| Other WECA |
|
9 292 |
|
90 |
|
1 021 |
| MENA |
|
8 568 |
|
21 |
|
1 228 |
| Syria |
|
2 036 |
|
1 |
|
32 |
| Sudan |
|
2 526 |
|
11 |
|
623 |
| Other MENA |
|
4 006 |
|
9 |
|
573 |
| Major joint venture – Irancell1 |
|
6 539 |
|
92 |
|
414 |
| Head office companies2, 3 |
|
1 077 |
|
– |
|
4 553 |
| Eliminations3 |
|
(166) |
|
(1) |
|
(4 661) |
| Hyperinflation impact |
|
2 169 |
|
11 |
|
651 |
| Irancell revenue exclusion |
|
(6 539) |
|
(92) |
|
(414) |
| Consolidated revenue |
|
133 933 |
|
9 289 |
|
15 224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| REVENUE |
|
Digital and
fintech
Rm |
|
Other
Rm |
|
|
Revenue from
contracts with
customers
Rm |
|
Interest
revenue
Rm |
|
Total
revenue
Rm |
| 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| South Africa |
|
2 170 |
|
1 331 |
|
|
45 070 |
|
403 |
|
45 473 |
| Nigeria |
|
2 341 |
|
559 |
|
|
57 980 |
|
– |
|
57 980 |
| SEAGHA |
|
7 777 |
|
781 |
|
|
34 034 |
|
– |
|
34 034 |
| Ghana |
|
4 487 |
|
241 |
|
|
17 245 |
|
– |
|
17 245 |
| Uganda |
|
2 135 |
|
125 |
|
|
8 320 |
|
– |
|
8 320 |
| Other SEAGHA |
|
1 155 |
|
415 |
|
|
8 469 |
|
– |
|
8 469 |
| WECA |
|
3 921 |
|
835 |
|
|
27 627 |
|
– |
|
27 627 |
| Cote d’lvoire |
|
1 472 |
|
459 |
|
|
8 776 |
|
– |
|
8 776 |
| Cameroon |
|
994 |
|
69 |
|
|
6 686 |
|
– |
|
6 686 |
| Other WECA |
|
1 455 |
|
307 |
|
|
12 165 |
|
– |
|
12 165 |
| MENA |
|
477 |
|
129 |
|
|
10 423 |
|
– |
|
10 423 |
| Syria |
|
213 |
|
13 |
|
|
2 295 |
|
– |
|
2 295 |
| Sudan |
|
119 |
|
27 |
|
|
3 306 |
|
– |
|
3 306 |
| Other MENA |
|
145 |
|
89 |
|
|
4 822 |
|
– |
|
4 822 |
| Major joint venture – Irancell1 |
|
393 |
|
114 |
|
|
7 552 |
|
21 |
|
7 573 |
| Head office companies2, 3 |
|
10 |
|
11 902 |
|
|
17 542 |
|
148 |
|
17 690 |
| Eliminations3 |
|
– |
|
(11 822) |
|
|
(16 650) |
|
(141) |
|
(16 791) |
| Hyperinflation impact |
|
66 |
|
28 |
|
|
2 925 |
|
– |
|
2 925 |
| Irancell revenue exclusion |
|
(393) |
|
(114) |
|
|
(7 552) |
|
(21) |
|
(7 573) |
| Consolidated revenue |
|
16 762 |
|
3 743 |
|
|
178 951 |
|
410 |
|
179 361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
Irancell proportionate results are included in the segment analysis as reviewed by the CODM. This is,
however, excluded from IFRS reported results due to equity accounting for joint ventures. |
| 2 |
Head office companies consist mainly of dividends received, revenue from GlobalConnect Solutions
Limited, the Group’s central financing activities and management fees from segments. |
| 3 |
The head office companies and eliminations have been disaggregated in the current year. The 2019 year
has been re-presented to reflect this disaggregation. |
| REVENUE |
| Network
services
Rm |
| Mobile
devices
Rm |
| Interconnect
and
roaming
Rm |
|
| Digital and
fintech
Rm |
| 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| South Africa |
| 27 926 |
| 9 017 |
| 4 381 |
|
| 2 066 |
| Nigeria |
| 39 545 |
| 88 |
| 4 995 |
|
| 1 584 |
| SEAGHA |
| 18 333 |
| 315 |
| 1 757 |
|
| 5 983 |
| Ghana |
| 9 275 |
| 90 |
| 915 |
|
| 3 326 |
| Uganda |
| 4 463 |
| 61 |
| 409 |
|
| 1 681 |
| Other SEAGHA |
| 4 595 |
| 164 |
| 433 |
|
| 976 |
| WECA |
| 16 240 |
| 171 |
| 2 280 |
|
| 2 511 |
| Cote d'lvoire |
| 4 535 |
| 37 |
| 899 |
|
| 1 041 |
| Cameroon |
| 4 248 |
| 62 |
| 457 |
|
| 571 |
| Other WECA |
| 7 457 |
| 72 |
| 924 |
|
| 899 |
| MENA |
| 7 520 |
| 37 |
| 1 006 |
|
| 343 |
| Syria |
| 2 745 |
| – |
| 51 |
|
| 167 |
| Sudan |
| 1 335 |
| 5 |
| 472 |
|
| 69 |
| Other MENA |
| 3 440 |
| 32 |
| 483 |
|
| 107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Major joint venture – Irancell1 |
| 6 715 |
| 104 |
| 526 |
|
| 539 |
| Head office companies2, 3 |
| 542 |
| 1 |
| 2 408 |
|
| 40 |
| Eliminations3 |
| (327) |
| – |
| (2 904) |
|
| – |
| Hyperinflation impact |
| 679 |
| 1 |
| 193 |
|
| 23 |
| Irancell revenue exclusion |
| (6 715) |
| (104) |
| (526) |
|
| (539) |
| Consolidated revenue |
| 110 458 |
| 9 630 |
| 14 116 |
|
| 12 550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| REVENUE |
Other
Rm |
|
| Revenue from
contracts with
customers
Rm |
| Interest
revenue
Rm |
| Total
revenue
Rm |
| 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| South Africa |
1 635 |
|
| 45 025 |
| 422 |
| 45 447 |
| Nigeria |
484 |
|
| 46 696 |
| – |
| 46 696 |
| SEAGHA |
681 |
|
| 27 069 |
| – |
| 27 069 |
| Ghana |
214 |
|
| 13 820 |
| – |
| 13 820 |
| Uganda |
86 |
|
| 6 700 |
| – |
| 6 700 |
| Other SEAGHA |
381 |
|
| 6 549 |
| – |
| 6 549 |
| WECA |
619 |
|
| 21 821 |
| – |
| 21 821 |
| Cote d'lvoire |
405 |
|
| 6 917 |
| – |
| 6 917 |
| Cameroon |
51 |
|
| 5 389 |
| – |
| 5 389 |
| Other WECA |
163 |
|
| 9 515 |
| – |
| 9 515 |
| MENA |
71 |
|
| 8 977 |
| – |
| 8 977 |
| Syria |
23 |
|
| 2 986 |
| – |
| 2 986 |
| Sudan |
22 |
|
| 1 903 |
| – |
| 1 903 |
| Other MENA |
26 |
|
| 4 088 |
| – |
| 4 088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Major joint venture – Irancell1 |
106 |
|
| 7 990 |
| 24 |
| 8 014 |
| Head office companies2, 3 |
12 309 |
|
| 15 300 |
| 106 |
| 15 406 |
| Eliminations3 |
(11 533) |
|
| (14 764) |
| (97) |
| (14 861) |
| Hyperinflation impact |
9 |
|
| 905 |
| – |
| 905 |
| Irancell revenue exclusion |
(106) |
|
| (7 990) |
| (24) |
| (8 014) |
| Consolidated revenue |
4 275 |
|
| 151 029 |
| 431 |
| 151 460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 |
Irancell proportionate results are included in the segment analysis as reviewed by the CODM. This is,
however, excluded from IFRS reported results due to equity accounting for joint ventures. |
| 2 |
Head office companies consist mainly of dividends received, revenue from GlobalConnect Solutions
Limited, the Group’s central financing activities and management fees from segments. |
| 3 |
The head office companies and eliminations have been disaggregated in the current year. The 2019 year
has been re-presented to reflect this disaggregation. |
| |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External versus
inter-segment
revenue |
|
External
revenue
Rm |
Inter-segment
revenue
Rm |
Total
revenue
Rm |
|
External
revenue
Rm |
Inter-segment
revenue
Rm |
Total
revenue
Rm |
| South Africa |
|
45 045 |
428 |
45 473 |
|
45 237 |
210 |
45 447 |
| Nigeria |
|
57 355 |
625 |
57 980 |
|
46 265 |
431 |
46 696 |
| SEAGHA |
|
32 934 |
1 100 |
34 034 |
|
26 259 |
810 |
27 069 |
| Ghana |
|
16 697 |
548 |
17 245 |
|
13 397 |
423 |
13 820 |
| Uganda |
|
7 936 |
384 |
8 320 |
|
6 471 |
229 |
6 700 |
| Other SEAGHA |
|
8 301 |
168 |
8 469 |
|
6 391 |
158 |
6 549 |
| WECA |
|
26 761 |
866 |
27 627 |
|
21 202 |
619 |
21 821 |
| Cote d’lvoire |
|
8 643 |
133 |
8 776 |
|
6 835 |
82 |
6 917 |
| Cameroon |
|
6 440 |
246 |
6 686 |
|
5 239 |
150 |
5 389 |
| Other WECA |
|
11 678 |
487 |
12 165 |
|
9 128 |
387 |
9 515 |
| MENA |
|
9 781 |
642 |
10 423 |
|
8 651 |
326 |
8 977 |
| Syria |
|
2 295 |
– |
2 295 |
|
2 986 |
– |
2 986 |
| Sudan |
|
2 804 |
502 |
3 306 |
|
1 634 |
269 |
1 903 |
| Other MENA |
|
4 682 |
140 |
4 822 |
|
4 031 |
57 |
4 088 |
| Major joint venture – Irancell1 |
|
7 573 |
– |
7 573 |
|
8 014 |
– |
8 014 |
| Head office companies2, 3 |
|
4 557 |
13 133 |
17 690 |
|
2 938 |
12 468 |
15 406 |
| Eliminations3 |
|
– |
(16 791) |
(16 791) |
|
– |
(14 861) |
(14 861) |
| Hyperinflation impact |
|
2 928 |
(3) |
2 925 |
|
908 |
(3) |
905 |
| Irancell revenue exclusion |
|
(7 573) |
– |
(7 573) |
|
(8 014) |
– |
(8 014) |
| Consolidated revenue |
|
179 361 |
– |
179 361 |
|
151 460 |
– |
151 460 |
| 1 |
Irancell proportionate results are included in the segment analysis as reviewed by the CODM. This is,
however, excluded from IFRS reported results due to equity accounting for joint ventures. |
| 2 |
Head office companies consist mainly of dividends received, revenue from GlobalConnect Solutions
Limited, the Group’s central financing activities and management fees from segments. |
| 3 |
The head office companies and eliminations have been disaggregated in the current year. The prior year
has been re-presented to reflect this disaggregation. |
| CODM EBITDA |
|
|
2019
Restated1
Rm |
|
|
|
|
|
| South Africa |
|
17 742 |
|
16 972 |
| Nigeria |
|
29 506 |
|
25 149 |
| SEAGHA |
|
16 802 |
|
12 136 |
| Ghana |
|
9 097 |
|
7 014 |
| Uganda |
|
4 118 |
|
3 150 |
| Other SEAGHA |
|
3 587 |
|
1 972 |
| WECA |
|
8 620 |
|
6 081 |
| Cote d’lvoire |
|
3 042 |
|
1 814 |
| Cameroon |
|
2 149 |
|
1 635 |
| Other WECA |
|
3 429 |
|
2 632 |
| MENA |
|
3 352 |
|
2 836 |
| Syria |
|
574 |
|
1 173 |
| Sudan |
|
1 428 |
|
677 |
| Other MENA |
|
1 350 |
|
986 |
| Head office companies2 |
|
1 871 |
|
(849) |
| Eliminations2 |
|
(2 570) |
|
315 |
| CODM EBITDA |
|
75 323 |
|
62 640 |
| Major joint venture – Irancell3 |
|
2 818 |
|
3 041 |
| Hyperinflation |
|
1 369 |
|
282 |
| Tower sale profits |
|
– |
|
19 |
| Gain on disposal/dilution of investment in joint ventures and associates |
|
6 129 |
|
1 039 |
| Gain on disposal of subsidiary |
|
– |
|
249 |
| Impairment loss on remeasurement of non-current assets held for sale |
|
(1 510) |
|
– |
| Irancell CODM EBITDA exclusion |
|
(2 818) |
|
(3 041) |
| CODM EBITDA before impairment of goodwill |
|
81 311 |
|
64 229 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of goodwill and joint venture |
|
(36 716) |
|
(32 800) |
| Net finance cost |
|
(18 233) |
|
(15 184) |
| Net monetary gain |
|
1 582 |
|
787 |
| Share of results of associates and joint ventures after tax |
|
1 142 |
|
705 |
| Profit before tax |
|
29 086 |
|
17 737 |
| 1 |
Restated for changes in accounting policies, refer to note 23 for details of restatements. |
| 2 |
The head office companies and eliminations have been disaggregated in the current year. The prior year
has been re-presented to reflect this disaggregation. |
| 3 |
The CODM EBITDA relating to the major joint venture, Irancell, has been presented after the Group CODM
EBITDA as Irancell does not form part of CODM EBITDA as it is a joint venture. |
| CAPITAL EXPENDITURE INCURRED |
|
|
2019
Rm |
|
|
|
|
|
| South Africa |
|
7 542 |
|
11 295 |
| Nigeria |
|
12 694 |
|
9 750 |
| SEAGHA |
|
6 063 |
|
5 554 |
| Ghana |
|
3 021 |
|
2 850 |
| Uganda |
|
1 328 |
|
1 147 |
| Other SEAGHA |
|
1 714 |
|
1 557 |
| WECA |
|
3 418 |
|
3 231 |
| Cote d’lvoire |
|
1 064 |
|
918 |
| Cameroon |
|
950 |
|
573 |
| Other WECA |
|
1 404 |
|
1 740 |
| MENA |
|
1 642 |
|
1 989 |
| Syria |
|
751 |
|
939 |
| Sudan |
|
495 |
|
430 |
| Other MENA |
|
396 |
|
620 |
| Major joint venture – Irancell1 |
|
1 865 |
|
2 568 |
| Head office companies2 |
|
1 286 |
|
949 |
| Eliminations2 |
|
– |
|
(115) |
| Hyperinflation impact |
|
394 |
|
215 |
| Irancell capex exclusion |
|
(1 865) |
|
(2 568) |
| |
|
33 039 |
|
32 868 |
| 1 |
Irancell proportionate results are included in the segment analysis as reviewed by the CODM. This is,
however, excluded from capital expenditure incurred due to equity accounting for joint ventures. |
| 2 |
The head office companies and eliminations have been disaggregated in the current year. The prior year
has been re-presented to reflect this disaggregation. |
|
|
|
| 9.1 |
Impairment of joint venture |
| |
The Group tested its investment in its equity-accounted e-commerce joint venture,
MEIH, for impairment. The Company experienced decreasing results in the current
year due to the impact of COVID-19 on the transportation and online booking platform
for household services business. The recoverable amount was determined as the fair
value less cost of disposal. The fair value represents a value determined from
unobservable inputs. This was based on comparable company and transaction
average net merchandise value multiples of 0,9x (2019: 1,3x) and revenue multiples of
4,4x for its transportation business, and merchandise value multiples of 0,6x
(2019: 1,4x) for its on-demand cleaning marketplace business. The carrying value of
the equity-accounted net assets exceeded the recoverable amount of R575 million
(2019: R572 million) by R67 million (2019: R342 million) and the Group recognised the
resulting impairment in profit or loss. |
| 9.2 |
Impairment of goodwill |
| |
The poor economic environment combined with further impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic in a number of the Group’s operations in the WECA and MENA regions
resulted in suppressed revenue growth and lower operating margins being
experienced, which decreased forecasted cash flows at 31 December 2020. In
addition, sovereign risk premiums have increased significantly for MTN Guinea-
Bissau and MTN Yemen given the macroeconomic environment in these countries.
This necessitated impairment reviews being performed on the Group’s operations in
Guinea-Bissau, Liberia and Yemen where the carrying amounts of these cash
generating units (CGUs), were compared to their respective recoverable amounts. The
recoverable amounts were determined through value-in-use calculations where
future cash flows were estimated and discounted at the weighted average cost of
capital discount rates. The discount rates and the perpetuity growth rates used in the
value-in-use calculations of the operations impacted by impairment are as follows:
| |
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Growth
rate
% |
Discount
rate
% |
Growth
rate
% |
Discount
rate
% |
| MTN Liberia |
|
2,8 |
19,0 |
2,3 |
21,0 |
| MTN Guinea-Bissau |
|
6,3 |
17,0 |
2,5 |
11,7 |
| MTN Yemen |
|
8,0 |
28,5 |
5,0 |
18,5 |
An impairment charge amounting to R525 million was recognised against the goodwill
of MTN Yemen. The operational and economic outlook in MTN Yemen remains negative
due to political instability and subdued economic conditions. This has an impact
across all industries in-country. As at 31 December 2020, the carrying value of this
CGU exceeded its recoverable amount, necessitating an impairment. The remaining
goodwill balance for MTN Yemen at 31 December 2020 amounts to R564 million, after
recognising the impairment charge.
An impairment charge amounting to R308 million was recognised against the goodwill
of MTN Liberia. The operational and economic outlook in MTN Liberia remains
negative due to the government struggling with its budget deficit and rising inflation
rates. This has an impact across all industries in-country. As at 31 December 2020,
the carrying value of this CGU exceeded its recoverable amount, necessitating an
impairment. The goodwill balance for MTN Liberia at 31 December 2020 amounts to
R124 million, after recognising the impairment charge.
An impairment charge amounting to R165 million was recognised against the goodwill
of MTN Guinea-Bissau. The operational and economic outlook in MTN Guinea-Bissau
remains uncertain due to political instability and volatile agricultural prices, which has
resulted in more conservative budgets being planned. As at 31 December 2020, the
carrying value of this CGU exceeded its recoverable amount, necessitating an
impairment. The goodwill balance for MTN Guinea-Bissau at 31 December 2020
amounts to R265 million, after recognising the impairment charge.
No impairment was required on goodwill balances as at 31 December 2019. |
|
|
|
|
| 2019
Rm |
|
| |
| |
| Interest income on loans and receivables |
|
605 |
| 923 |
| Interest income on bank deposits |
|
888 |
| 950 |
| Finance income |
|
1 493 |
| 1 873 |
| Interest expense on financial liabilities measured at amortised cost1 |
|
(8 816) |
| (8 767) |
| Net foreign exchange losses |
|
(4 537) |
| (2 364) |
| Unwind of/(loss on) revision of cash flows2 |
|
174 |
| (217) |
| Lease liability interest expense |
|
(6 547) |
| (5 709) |
|
| |
|
|
|
| Finance costs |
|
(19 726) |
| (17 057) |
| Net finance costs recognised in profit or loss |
|
(18 233) |
| (15 184) |
| 1 |
Included in 2019 is an amount of R189 million which relates to the discount unwind on the MTN Nigeria regulatory fine liability. |
| 2 |
Refer to note 11 for details on the balance with Irancell. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2019
Rm |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
1 142 |
| 705 |
| Irancell |
|
538 |
| 441 |
| Others |
|
604 |
| 264 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Irancell loan and receivable
On 20 September 2019, the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) as being subject to sanctions. Sanctions imposed on the CBI creates a secondary sanctions risk for MTN entities if the CBI allocates foreign currency to an MTN entity for the purpose of repatriating the receivable and/or loan. As at 31 December 2020, Iranian rial denominated receivables amounted to R1 037 million1 (2019: R1 237 million) and the Iranian rial denominated loan amounted to R1 733 million2 (2019: R1 516 million).
| 1 |
Includes R840 million at the SANA rate. Includes R197 million at the CBI rate. |
| 2 |
The amount outstanding was translated at the CBI rate. |
|
|
| Number of ordinary shares |
|
| 2019 |
|
| |
| |
| Number of ordinary shares in issue |
| |
| |
| At end of the year (excluding MTN Zakhele Futhi and treasury shares) |
|
1 798 990 980 |
| 1 798 007 746 |
| Weighted average number of shares |
|
1 798 503 457 |
| 1 797 927 770 |
| Add: Dilutive shares |
|
|
|
|
| – Share options – MTN Zakhele Futhi |
|
11 045 701 |
| 23 250 313 |
| – Share schemes |
|
8 443 911 |
| 4 381 435 |
| Shares for dilutive earnings per share |
|
1 817 993 069 |
| 1 825 559 518 |
Treasury shares
Treasury shares of 8 443 400 (2019: 9 426 634) are held by the Group and 76 835 378 (2019: 76 835 378) are held by MTN Zakhele Futhi (RF) Limited (MTN Zakhele Futhi).
Headline earnings
Headline earnings is calculated in accordance with Circular 1/2019 Headline Earnings as issued by SAICA as amended from time to time and as required by the JSE Limited.
|
|
|
| 2019
Restated1
Rm |
|
| |
| |
| Reconciliation between net profit attributable to the equity holders of the company and headline earnings: |
|
|
|
|
| Profit attributable to equity holders of the company |
|
17 022 |
| 9 100 |
| Net profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets |
|
(24) |
| (64) |
| – Subsidiaries (IAS 16) |
|
(22) |
| (64) |
| – Joint ventures (IAS 28) |
|
(2) |
| – |
| Profit on disposal of subsidiary (IFRS 10) |
|
– |
| (249) |
| Impairment of goodwill and investments in joint ventures (IAS 36) |
|
1 065 |
| 342 |
| Net impairment loss on property, plant and equipment (IAS 36) |
|
42 |
| 330 |
| Impairment loss on remeasurement of non-current asset held for sale (IFRS 5) |
|
1 510 |
| – |
| – Subsidiary |
|
1 113 |
| – |
| – Associate |
|
397 |
| – |
| Net gain on disposal/dilution of investment in joint venture/associate (IAS 28) |
|
(6 129) |
| (1 076) |
| – Subsidiaries |
|
(6 129) |
| (1 039) |
| – Joint venture/associate |
|
– |
| (37) |
| Realisation of deferred gain on tower sale |
|
– |
| (19) |
| Total non-controlling interest effect of adjustments |
|
(13) |
| 47 |
| Headline earnings |
|
13 473 |
| 8 411 |
| Earnings per share (cents) |
|
|
|
|
| – Basic |
|
946 |
| 506 |
| – Basic headline |
|
749 |
| 468 |
| Diluted earnings per share (cents) |
|
|
|
|
| – Diluted |
|
936 |
| 498 |
| – Diluted headline |
|
741 |
| 461 |
1 Restated for change in accounting policy, refer to note 23 for details of restatements. |
|
The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:
credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk (foreign exchange, interest rate and price risk).
This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to the above risks, the
Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk, and the
Group’s management of capital. While MTN Syria has been classified as a disposal
group held for sale, the entity still exposes the Group to risks relating to financial
instruments. Accordingly, MTN Syria has contributed to the disclosure below. |
| 13.1 |
Financial assets and financial liabilities at amortised cost
The carrying value of current receivables and liabilities measured at amortised cost
approximates their fair value.
Listed long-term borrowings
The Group has listed long-term fixed interest rate senior unsecured notes in issue
which were issued in prior years, with a carrying amount of R25 987 million at
31 December 2020 (2019: R24 706 million) and a fair value of R27 691 million
(2019: R25 775 million). The notes are listed on the Irish bond market and the fair
values of these instruments are determined by reference to quoted prices in this
market. The market for these bonds is not considered to be liquid and consequently
the fair value measurement is categorised within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
| 13.2 |
Financial instruments measured at fair value
IHS Group unlisted equity investment
The fair values of financial instruments measured at fair value are determined as follows:
Included in investments in the statement of financial position is an equity investment
in IHS Group at fair value of R27 197 million (2019: R27 000 million). The fair value is
determined using models considered to be appropriate by management, due to the
absence of transactions between market participants. The fair value was calculated
using an earnings multiple technique and was based on unobservable market inputs
including international tower industry earnings multiples of between 10x to 13x
(2019: 10x to 14x) applied to MTN management’s estimates of earnings, less estimated
net debt of R23 330 million (2019: R20 217 million). The Group has applied a combined
liquidity and macro discount of 30% (2019: liquidity discount of 10%). A fair value
decrease of R1 151 million (2019: R4 297 million increase) translated at the closing
rate has been recognised for the year.
Given the confidentiality restrictions in the shareholders’ agreement with IHS Group,
MTN does not have access to the IHS Group business plans or actual financial
information. Any estimated earnings used to derive the existing fair value are therefore
solely based on MTN management assumptions and market estimates on financial
growth, currency movements, costs and performance. The investment has therefore
been classified as level 3 on the fair value hierarchy. An increase of one in the low and
high end of the multiple range, keeping other inputs constant, would have resulted in
an increase in the fair value of R2 700 million (2019: R2 813 million) and a decrease of
one in the low and high end of the multiple range, keeping other inputs constant, would
have resulted in a decrease in the fair value by R2 700 million (2019: R2 813 million).
An increase of 10% in the estimated earnings used, keeping other inputs constant,
would have resulted in an increase in the fair value of R3 019 million (2019:
R3 228 million) and a decrease of 10% in the estimated earnings used, keeping other
inputs constant, would have resulted in a decrease in the fair value of R3 019 million
(2019: R3 228 million).
An increase of 1% to the combined liquidity and macro discount (2019: liquidity
discount), keeping other inputs constant, would have resulted in a decrease in the fair
value of R389 million (2019: R300 million) and a decrease of 1% to the combined
liquidity and macro discount (2019: liquidity discount), keeping other inputs constant,
would have resulted in an increase in the fair value by R389 million (2019: R300 million).
Reconciliation of level 3 financial assets
The table below sets out the reconciliation of financial assets that are measured at fair value based on inputs that are not based on observable market data (level 3):
| Insurance cell captives |
Rm |
| Balance at 1 January 2019 |
1 597 |
| Contributions paid to insurance cell captives |
469 |
| Claims received by insurance cell captives |
(123) |
| Loss recognised in profit or loss |
(131) |
| Balance at 1 January 2020 |
1 812 |
| Contributions paid to insurance cell captives |
605 |
| Claims received by insurance cell captives |
(869) |
| Loss recognised in profit or loss |
(410) |
| Balance at 31 December 2020 |
1 138 |
| Investments |
Rm |
| Balance at 1 January 2019 |
24 025 |
| Disposal of underlying equity investments of Amadeus |
(592) |
| Acquisitions |
75 |
| Gain on equity investments at fair value through other comprehensive income |
4 401 |
| Foreign exchange differences |
(751) |
| Balance at 1 January 2020 |
27 158 |
| Acquisitions |
158 |
| Loss on equity investments at fair value through other comprehensive income |
(1 575) |
| Foreign exchange differences |
1 829 |
| Balance at 31 December 2020 |
27 570 |
|
| 13.3 |
Credit risk
Credit risk, or the risk of financial loss to the Group due to customers or counterparties
not meeting their contractual obligations, is managed through the application of
credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. The Group’s maximum exposure
to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of the financial assets and
contract assets that are exposed to credit risk.
The risk rating grade of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash range from AA+ to B- (2019: A+ to BBB-). Given these credit ratings, management expects that the exposure to credit risk is minimal.
Mobile Money deposits
MoMo deposits are balances that are held with banks for and on behalf of MoMo
customers. Regulations in certain jurisdictions specify the types of permissible liquid
instruments in which these deposits may be invested in. MoMo deposits are spread
among approved, reputable financial institutions based on internal risk assessments
or guidance provided by regulators, to manage the concentration of credit risk to a
single counterparty. Many risk mitigations are in place and banks are also obliged to
pay insurance premiums to protect MoMo customer deposits (or a portion thereof) in
the event of bank failure.
As a result of the uncertain and evolving legal and regulatory environment, the
assessment of which party in a MoMo arrangement is exposed to a bank credit risk
event, has become increasingly complex and dependent on legal interpretations that
are largely untested in the respective markets in which the Group operates.
Consequently, the assessment of the Group’s credit risk exposure with regards to
MoMo remains subject to legal and regulatory developments.
The treatment of MoMo in the financial statements is not and should not be construed
as a waiver by the members of the Group of any legal, contractual or statutory rights,
remedies, and defences they may have, or as an admission of liability enforceable
against any of them in law or otherwise. The legal, contractual, and statutory rights,
remedies and defences of members of the Group are reserved.
Trade receivables and contract assets (unbilled handset component)
A large portion of the Group’s postpaid market revenues are generated in South
Africa. There are no other significant concentrations of credit risk, since the other
operations within the Group operate largely within the prepaid market. The Group has
policies in place to ensure that retail sales of products and services are made to
customers with an appropriate credit history. Before credit is granted to a customer,
the Group performs credit risk assessments through credit bureaus. The Group
insures some of its trade receivables in its South African operation, in which instance
the credit risk assessments are performed by the credit insurer prior to the granting
of credit by the Group. In terms of this arrangement R6,3 billion (2019: R6,5 billion) has
been insured, for which the Group’s risk is limited to R1,1 billion (2019: R1 billion). In
addition, some entities within the Group require potential customers to obtain
guarantees from banks before credit is granted. During the current year the Group did
not recognise ECLs amounting to R33,7 million (2019: R97 million) as a result of
collateral held.
Total past due receivables
|
Interconnect
receivables
Rm |
Contract
receivables
Rm |
Retail
receivables
Rm |
EBU
receivables
Rm |
Other
receivables1
Rm |
Total
Rm |
| 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MTN SA |
266 |
523 |
613 |
679 |
1 116 |
3 197 |
| MTN Nigeria |
87 |
241 |
– |
– |
332 |
660 |
| MTN Cote d'lvoire |
114 |
286 |
175 |
– |
130 |
705 |
| MTN Yemen |
510 |
83 |
– |
– |
109 |
702 |
| MTN Cameroon |
11 |
24 |
51 |
311 |
28 |
425 |
| MTN Benin |
106 |
– |
– |
– |
642 |
748 |
| MTN Guinea-Conakry |
189 |
82 |
247 |
44 |
15 |
577 |
| MTN Congo-Brazzaville |
250 |
– |
– |
473 |
– |
723 |
| Other operations |
396 |
223 |
329 |
521 |
524 |
1 993 |
|
1 929 |
1 462 |
1 415 |
2 028 |
2 896 |
9 730 |
1 Other receivables include both national and international roaming receivables.
|
Interconnect
receivables
Rm |
Contract
receivables
Rm |
Retail
receivables
Rm |
EBU
receivables
Rm |
Other
receivables1
Rm |
Total
Rm |
| 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MTN SA |
479 |
669 |
665 |
189 |
74 |
2 076 |
| MTN Nigeria |
114 |
114 |
– |
– |
255 |
483 |
| MTN Cote d–Ivoire |
56 |
314 |
161 |
– |
92 |
623 |
| MTN Yemen |
524 |
86 |
– |
– |
66 |
676 |
| MTN Cameroon |
69 |
43 |
85 |
247 |
29 |
473 |
| MTN Benin |
142 |
– |
– |
– |
412 |
554 |
| MTN Guinea-Conakry |
171 |
79 |
87 |
164 |
18 |
519 |
| MTN Congo-Brazzaville |
175 |
– |
– |
323 |
– |
498 |
| Other operations |
669 |
262 |
189 |
193 |
583 |
1 896 |
|
2 399 |
1 567 |
1 187 |
1 116 |
1 529 |
7 798 |
Expected credit losses
Application of the ECL model had an immaterial impact on all financial assets except
for contract assets and trade receivables.
Provision Matrix – ECLs are calculated by applying a loss ratio to the aged balance of
trade receivables at each reporting date. The loss ratio is calculated according to the
ageing/payment profile of sales by applying historical/ proxy write offs, to the payment
profile of the sales population. In instances where there was no evidence of historical
write offs management used a proxy write off. Trade receivable balances have been
grouped so that the ECL calculation is performed on groups of receivables with similar
risk characteristics and ability to pay. Similarly, the sales population selected to
determine the ageing/payment profile of the sales is representative of the entire
population and in line with future payment expectations. The historic loss ratio is then
adjusted for forward-looking information (including forecast economic indicators, as
affected by the COVID-19 pandemic) to determine the ECL for the portfolio of trade
receivables at the reporting date to the extent that there is a strong correlation
between the forward-looking information, and the ECL.
Simplified parameter-based approach – ECL is calculated using a formula
incorporating the following parameters: Exposure at Default (EAD), Probability of
Default (PD), Loss Given Default (LGD) discounted using the Effective Interest Rate
(EIR) (i.e. PD x LGD x EAD = ECL). The probability of default has been increased for the
estimated deteriorated gross domestic product growth in South Africa.
1 Other receivables include both national and international roaming receivables.
The loss allowance for trade receivables to which the provision matrix and simplified matrix approach has been applied is determined as follows:
|
|
Gross
carrying
amount
Rm |
Impairment
Rm |
Average
ECL/
Impairment
ratio
% |
| 2020 |
|
|
|
|
| Interconnect receivables |
|
2 636 |
(516) |
19,58 |
| Fully performing |
|
707 |
(24) |
3,39 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
571 |
(30) |
5,25 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
1 358 |
(462) |
34,02 |
| Contract receivables |
|
1 418 |
(504) |
35,54 |
| Fully performing |
|
479 |
(28) |
5,85 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
277 |
(17) |
6,14 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
662 |
(459) |
69,34 |
| Retail receivables |
|
7 673 |
(435) |
5,67 |
| Fully performing |
|
6 258 |
(1) |
0,02 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
612 |
(77) |
12,58 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
803 |
(357) |
44,46 |
| EBU receivables |
|
2 488 |
(946) |
38,02 |
| Fully performing |
|
460 |
(41) |
8,91 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
607 |
(43) |
7,08 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
1 421 |
(862) |
60,66 |
| Other receivables1 |
|
3 187 |
(469) |
14,72 |
| Fully performing |
|
291 |
(5) |
1,72 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
683 |
(54) |
7,91 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
2 213 |
(410) |
18,53 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Simplified parameter-based approach |
|
|
|
|
| Trade receivables |
|
1 073 |
(268) |
24,98 |
| Contract assets |
|
4 191 |
(499) |
11,91 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
22 666 |
(3 637) |
16,05 |
1 Other receivables include both national and international roaming receivables.
The loss allowance for trade receivables to which the provision matrix and simplified matrix approach has been applied is determined as follows:
|
|
Gross
carrying
amount
Rm |
Impairment
Rm |
Average
ECL/
Impairment
ratio
% |
| 2019 |
|
|
|
|
| Interconnect receivables |
|
3 074 |
(458) |
14,90 |
| Fully performing |
|
675 |
(72) |
10,67 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
566 |
(73) |
12,90 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
1 833 |
(313) |
17,08 |
| Contract receivables |
|
1 262 |
(453) |
35,90 |
| Fully performing |
|
364 |
(16) |
4,40 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
295 |
(98) |
33,22 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
603 |
(339) |
56,22 |
| Retail receivables |
|
7 026 |
(403) |
5,74 |
| Fully performing |
|
5 839 |
(41) |
0,70 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
412 |
(4) |
0,97 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
775 |
(358) |
46,19 |
| EBU receivables |
|
2 165 |
(473) |
21,85 |
| Fully performing |
|
1 049 |
(45) |
4,29 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
260 |
(38) |
14,62 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
856 |
(390) |
45,56 |
| Other receivables1 |
|
2 056 |
(187) |
9,10 |
| Fully performing |
|
527 |
(31) |
5,88 |
| Up to 90 days past due |
|
479 |
(3) |
0,63 |
| 120 days and above past due |
|
1 050 |
(153) |
14,57 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Simplified parameter-based approach |
|
|
|
|
| Trade receivables |
|
1 292 |
(397) |
30,73 |
| Contract assets |
|
4 206 |
(338) |
8,04 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
21 081 |
(2 709) |
12,85 |
| 1 Other receivables include both national and international roaming receivables. |
Trade receivables are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery.
This is assessed individually by each operation and includes for example where the
trade receivables have been handed over for collection and remain outstanding or the
debtor has entered bankruptcy.
A net impairment loss of R1 009 million (2019: R245 million) was recognised during
the year for trade receivables. In addition to the R486 million (2019: R531 million)
provision utilised, R999 million (2019: R347 million) was written off directly to profit or
loss during the year.
A net impairment loss of R161 million (2019: R137 million) was recognised during the
year for contract assets and Rnil (2019: R187 million) of the provision was utilised. |
| 13.4 |
Liquidity risk
The Group’s approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that sufficient liquidity is
available to meet its liabilities when due under both normal and stressed conditions,
without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation.
Group treasury develops strategies to ensure that the Group has sufficient cash on
demand or access to facilities to meet expected operational expenses, and to service
financial obligations. This excludes the potential impact of extreme circumstances
that cannot reasonably be predicted, such as natural disasters. Group treasury
performs regular cash flow forecasts, monitors cash holdings of the Group, negotiates
lines of credit and sets policies for maturity profiles of loans.
The Group has undrawn variable rate facilities of R33,3 billion (2019: R33,8 billion).
Holdco cash balances including restricted cash and current investments was
R20,6 billion as at 31 December 2020 (2019: R11,6 billion).
The following are the undiscounted contractual cash flows of financial liabilities:
|
| Carrying
amount
Rm |
Total
Rm |
Payable
within
one month
or on
demand
Rm |
More than
one month
but not
exceeding
three months
Rm |
| 2020 |
|
|
|
|
| Borrowings |
95 895 |
111 485 |
1 634 |
6 316 |
| Other non-current liabilities1 |
149 |
149 |
– |
– |
| Lease liabilities1 |
49 637 |
81 161 |
839 |
2 701 |
| Trade and other payables1 |
38 597 |
38 636 |
26 029 |
3 795 |
| Mobile Money payables |
28 008 |
28 008 |
28 008 |
– |
| Derivative liabilities |
7 |
7 |
– |
– |
| Bank overdrafts |
354 |
355 |
176 |
77 |
|
| 212 647 |
259 801 |
56 686 |
12 889 |
| 2019 |
|
|
|
|
| Borrowings |
94 148 |
104 426 |
8 178 |
1 301 |
| Other non-current liabilities |
383 |
383 |
5 |
3 |
| Lease liabilities |
46 327 |
90 789 |
786 |
2 061 |
| Trade and other payables |
33 719 |
33 994 |
22 576 |
6 218 |
| Mobile Money payables |
15 315 |
15 315 |
15 315 |
– |
| Derivative liabilities |
21 |
21 |
21 |
– |
| Bank overdrafts |
132 |
132 |
128 |
– |
|
| 190 045 |
245 060 |
47 009 |
9 583 |
|
| More than
three months
but not
exceeding
one year
Rm |
More than
one year
but not
exceeding
two years
Rm |
More than
two years
but not
exceeding |
More than
five years
Rm |
| 2020 |
|
|
|
|
| Borrowings |
13 275 |
23 580 |
54 791 |
11 889 |
| Other non-current liabilities1 |
– |
6 |
7 |
136 |
| Lease liabilities1 |
6 813 |
8 780 |
25 525 |
36 503 |
| Trade and other payables1 |
8 812 |
– |
– |
– |
| Mobile Money payables |
– |
– |
– |
– |
| Derivative liabilities |
7 |
– |
– |
– |
| Bank overdrafts |
102 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| 29 009 |
32 366 |
80 323 |
48 528 |
| 2019 |
|
|
|
|
| Borrowings |
4 831 |
27 908 |
48 601 |
13 607 |
| Other non-current liabilities |
4 |
– |
– |
371 |
| Lease liabilities |
7 340 |
7 802 |
25 539 |
47 261 |
| Trade and other payables |
5 200 |
– |
– |
– |
| Mobile Money payables |
– |
– |
– |
– |
| Derivative liabilities |
– |
– |
– |
– |
| Bank overdrafts |
4 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| 17 379 |
35 710 |
74 140 |
61 239 |
|
13.5 |
Market risk |
| 13.5.1 |
Interest rate risk
The Group’s interest rate risk arises from the repricing of the Group’s floating rate
debt, incremental funding or new borrowings, the refinancing of existing borrowings
and the magnitude of the cash balances which exist.
At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial
instruments was:
|
Restated 20191,2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
instruments
Rm |
Variable
rate
instruments
Rm |
Fixed rate
instruments
Rm |
Variable
rate
instruments
Rm |
| Non-current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
| Loans and other non-current receivables |
29 |
286 |
79 |
392 |
| Investments |
948 |
– |
– |
– |
| Mobile Money deposits |
329 |
– |
– |
– |
| Current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
| Trade and other receivables1 |
– |
1 311 |
50 |
2 048 |
| Current investments |
8 787 |
– |
2 579 |
– |
| Restricted cash |
87 |
33 |
170 |
– |
| Mobile Money deposits2 |
5 307 |
16 319 |
3 236 |
8 266 |
| Cash and cash equivalents |
4 475 |
12 655 |
4 565 |
11 044 |
|
19 962 |
30 604 |
10 679 |
21 750 |
| 1 |
Included in variable rate trade and other receivables for 31 December 2019 was an amount of R1 651 million relating to a loan that has now been restated as a non-interest bearing instrument based on the interest rate position existing at 31 December 2019. |
| 2 |
Included in both variable rate MoMo deposits and payables for 31 December 2019 was an amount of R1 863 million that have now been restated as fixed rate instruments based on the interest rate position existing at 31 December 2019. |
|
Restated 20191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
instruments
Rm |
Variable
rate
instruments
Rm |
Fixed rate
instruments
Rm |
Variable
rate
instruments
Rm |
| Non–current financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| Borrowings |
31 369 |
47 088 |
27 292 |
51 165 |
| Other non–current liabilities |
13 |
136 |
– |
373 |
| Current financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| Trade and other payables |
140 |
635 |
210 |
182 |
| Mobile Money payables1 |
1 765 |
16 290 |
3 236 |
8 266 |
| Borrowings |
2 622 |
14 816 |
5 716 |
9 975 |
| Bank overdrafts |
173 |
176 |
75 |
57 |
|
36 082 |
79 141 |
36 529 |
70 018 |
| 1 |
Included in both variable rate MoMo deposits and payables for 31 December 2019 was an amount of R1 863 million that has now been restated as fixed rate instruments based on the interest rate position existing at 31 December 2019 |
The Group has used a sensitivity analysis technique that measures the estimated
change to profit or loss of an instantaneous increase or decrease of 1% (100 basis
points) in market interest rates, from the rate applicable at 31 December, for each
class of financial instrument with all other variables remaining constant. This analysis
is for illustrative purposes only, as in practice market rates rarely change in isolation.
The Group is mainly exposed to fluctuations in the following market interest rates:
JIBAR, LIBOR, NIBOR, Money market and Prime. Changes in market interest rates
affect the interest income or expense of floating rate financial instruments. A change
in the above market interest rates at the reporting date would have increased/
(decreased) profit before tax by the amounts shown in the table to follow.
The analysis has been performed on the basis of the change occurring at the start of
the reporting period and assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign
currency rates, remain constant.
The analysis is performed on the same basis as was used for 2019.
|
Restated 20191 |
|
|
|
|
(Decrease)/increase in profit before tax |
(Decrease)/increase in profit before tax |
|
Change
in interest
rate
% |
Upward
change
in interest
rate
Rm |
Downward
change
in interest
rate
Rm |
Change
in interest
rate
% |
Upward
change
in interest
rate
Rm |
Downward
change
in interest
rate
Rm |
| JIBAR |
1 |
(331,1) |
331,1 |
1 |
(329,8) |
329,8 |
| LIBOR and associated rates |
1 |
(57,3) |
57,3 |
1 |
(19,1) |
19,1 |
| NIBOR |
1 |
(175,9) |
175,9 |
1 |
(143,6) |
143,6 |
| Money market |
1 |
(20,8) |
20,8 |
1 |
75,3 |
(75,3) |
| Prime |
1 |
100,3 |
(100,3) |
1 |
18,5 |
(18,5) |
| Other1 |
1 |
(0,5) |
0,5 |
1 |
3,3 |
(3,3) |
| 1 |
Included in variable rate trade and other receivables for 31 December 2019 was an amount of R1 651 million relating to a loan that has now been restated as a non-interest bearing instrument based on the interest rate position existing at 31 December 2019. |
|
| 13.5.2 |
Currency risk
Currency risk arises on recognised financial assets and liabilities which are
denominated in a currency that is not the entity’s functional currency. The Group aims
to maintain its foreign currency exposure within internally determined parameters,
however, this depends on the market conditions in the geographies where the Group
operates. Group treasury reports on the status of foreign currency positions or
derivatives to the Group Treasury Committee on a regular basis.
Where possible, entities in the Group use forward contracts to hedge their actual
exposure to foreign currency.
Sensitivity analysis
The Group has used a sensitivity analysis technique that measures the estimated
change to profit or loss and to other comprehensive income (OCI), of an instantaneous
10% strengthening or weakening in the rand against all other currencies, from the
rate applicable at 31 December 2020, for each class of financial instrument with all
other variables remaining constant. This analysis is for illustrative purposes only, as in
practice, market rates rarely change in isolation.
The Group is mainly exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates in respect of
the US dollar, euro, Nigerian naira and Iranian rial. This analysis considers the impact
of changes in foreign exchange rates on profit or loss and OCI.
The analysis excludes foreign exchange translation differences resulting from the
translation of Group entities that have functional currencies different from the
presentation currency, into the Group’s presentation currency, which are recognised
in the foreign currency translation reserve.
The analysis has been performed on the basis of the change occurring at the reporting
date and assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.
Intercompany balances that are denominated in a currency other than the functional
currency of the entity are reflected as either impacting profit or loss before tax, or
equity in the case of loans for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur
in the foreseeable future.
A change in the foreign exchange rates to which the Group is exposed at the reporting
date would have increased/ (decreased) profit before tax or equity by the amounts shown
below.
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in profit before tax |
| Denominated: Functional currency |
Net assets/
(liabilities)
denominated
in foreign
currency
Rm |
Change in
exchange
rate
% |
Weakening
in functional
currency
Rm |
Strengthening
in
functional
currency
Rm |
| 2020 |
|
|
|
|
| US$:ZAR1 |
8 417 |
10 |
841,7 |
(841,7) |
| US$:SYP |
(418) |
10 |
(12,4) |
12,4 |
| US$:SDG |
(1 172) |
10 |
(28,5) |
28,5 |
| US$:SSP |
(6 365) |
10 |
(48,4) |
48,4 |
| US$:NGN |
(19 309) |
10 |
(1 930,9) |
1 930,9 |
| EUR:SDG |
(2 100) |
10 |
(1,3) |
1,3 |
| EUR:US$ |
3 167 |
10 |
316,7 |
(316,7) |
| US$:GNF |
(4 561) |
10 |
(176,9) |
176,9 |
| US$:ZMK |
(439) |
10 |
(43,9) |
43,9 |
| IRR:ZAR |
2 815 |
10 |
281,5 |
(281,5) |
| EUR:ZAR |
(258) |
10 |
(25,8) |
25,8 |
| NGN:ZAR |
4 197 |
10 |
419,7 |
(419,7) |
| 2019 |
|
|
|
|
| US$:ZAR1 |
18 583 |
10 |
1 858,3 |
(1 858,3) |
| US$:SYP |
( 516) |
10 |
(31,9) |
31,9 |
| US$:SDG |
(1 344) |
10 |
(40,8) |
40,8 |
| US$:SSP |
(5 809) |
10 |
(45,9) |
45,9 |
| US$:NGN1 |
(8 522) |
10 |
(852,2) |
852,2 |
| EUR:SDG |
(1 668) |
10 |
(1,1) |
1,1 |
| EUR:US$ |
2 509 |
10 |
250,9 |
(250,9) |
| US$:GNF |
(4 092) |
10 |
(143,2) |
143,2 |
| US$:ZMK |
( 104) |
10 |
(10,4) |
10,4 |
| IRR:ZAR |
2 753 |
10 |
275,3 |
(275,3) |
| EUR:ZAR |
203 |
10 |
20,3 |
(20,3) |
|
Increase/(decrease) in OCI |
| Denominated: Functional currency |
Change
in exchange
rate
% |
Weakening
in functional
currency
Rm |
Strengthening
in
functional
currency |
| 2020 |
|
|
|
| US$:ZAR1 |
10 |
– |
– |
| US$:SYP |
10 |
(29,4) |
29,4 |
| US$:SDG |
10 |
(88,7) |
88,7 |
| US$:SSP |
10 |
(588,1) |
588,1 |
| US$:NGN |
10 |
– |
– |
| EUR:SDG |
10 |
(208,7) |
208,7 |
| EUR:US$ |
10 |
– |
– |
| US$:GNF |
10 |
(279,2) |
279,2 |
| US$:ZMK |
10 |
– |
– |
| IRR:ZAR |
10 |
– |
– |
| EUR:ZAR |
10 |
– |
– |
| NGN:ZAR |
10 |
– |
– |
| 2019 |
|
|
|
| US$:ZAR1 |
10 |
– |
– |
| US$:SYP |
10 |
(19,7) |
19,7 |
| US$:SDG |
10 |
(93,6) |
93,6 |
| US$:SSP |
10 |
(535,0) |
535,0 |
| US$:NGN1 |
10 |
– |
– |
| EUR:SDG |
10 |
(165,7) |
165,7 |
| EUR:US$ |
10 |
– |
– |
| US$:GNF |
10 |
(266,0) |
266,0 |
| US$:ZMK |
10 |
– |
– |
| IRR:ZAR |
10 |
– |
– |
| EUR:ZAR |
10 |
– |
– |
¹ Reduced by the impact of the net investment hedge as disclosed in note 18. |
| 13.6 |
Capital management
Management regularly monitors compliance with its financial covenants. In terms of
most of the banking facilities, the Group is required to comply with financial covenants.
These financial covenants differ based on the contractual terms of each facility and
incorporate both IFRS and non-IFRS financial measures. With the exception of MTN
Zambia and MTN Côte d’Ivoire, the Group has complied with its financial covenants
during the current and prior year. For the year ended 31 December 2020, MTN Zambia
breached its debt service cover ratio covenant. As a result, the full related borrowings
of R820 million have been classified as current as at 31 December 2020 within the
Group statement of financial position. On 9 March 2021, the lenders granted
MTN Zambia a waiver of the debt service cover ratio breach, thereby remedying the
breach. For the year ended 31 December 2019, MTN Côte d’Ivoire breached its net
debt: EBITDA covenant. As a result, the full related borrowings of R3 559 million were
classified as current as at 31 December 2019 within the Group statement of financial
position. As at 31 December 2019, the Group had met interest-related covenants, and
these have improved further in the current period. Holdco leverage has increased
since December 2019 due to the weakening of the rand on US dollar denominated
borrowings and cash upstreaming challenges from MTN Nigeria due to limited
availability of foreign currency.
MTN Cameroon, with the support of MTN Group, had been in discussions with its
lender since the beginning of 2020 to restructure a syndicated revolving credit facility
of CFA 30 billion (US$56 million) initially maturing on 8 June 2020. Due to not having
concluded the restructuring by the maturity date, MTN Cameroon was in technical
default in respect of the repayment provisions. This default was subsequently
remedied by a waiver from affected lenders. MTN Cameroon successfully concluded
the restructuring by 31 December 2020. The maturity date of the CFA 30 billion
syndicated revolving credit facility was extended to 8 December 2021 and another of
MTN Cameroon’s syndicated revolving credit facilities of CFA 32,5 billion
(US$61 million) initially due on 15 December 2021 was extended to 16 May 2023.
Under the amended facility agreements, MTN Cameroon will repay each of the
facilities through equal monthly repayments. |
|
|
|
2019
Rm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 408 |
|
|
31 273 |
|
| – Contracted |
|
6 814 |
|
|
6 548 |
|
| – Not contracted |
|
22 594 |
|
|
24 725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
Rm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bank overdrafts |
|
354 |
|
|
132 |
|
| Current borrowings |
|
17 438 |
|
|
15 691 |
|
| Current liabilities |
|
17 792 |
|
|
15 823 |
|
| Non-current borrowings |
|
78 457 |
|
|
78 457 |
|
|
|
96 249 |
|
|
94 280 |
|
|
|
During the year under review the following entities raised and repaid significant debt instruments:
|
|
Raised 2019 Rm |
|
|
Repaid 2019 Rm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mobile Telephone Networks Holdings Limited |
|
12 250 |
|
|
14 512 |
|
|
15 950 |
|
|
14 013 |
|
| Loan facilities |
|
5 550 |
|
|
9 458 |
|
|
8 000 |
|
|
7 363 |
|
| General banking facilities |
|
2 500 |
|
|
2 500 |
|
|
3 700 |
|
|
5 500 |
|
| Domestic medium term programme |
|
4 200 |
|
|
2 554 |
|
|
4 250 |
|
|
1 150 |
|
| MTN International (Mauritius) Limited |
|
– |
|
|
1 913 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
| Loan facilities |
|
– |
|
|
1 913 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
| MTN Nigeria Communications Plc |
|
6 182 |
|
|
1 796 |
|
|
15 030 |
|
|
5 792 |
|
| Long-term borrowings |
|
1 841 |
|
|
1 022 |
|
|
15 030 |
|
|
5 792 |
|
| Commercial paper issuance1 |
|
4 341 |
|
|
774 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
| Other |
|
4 119 |
|
|
4 434 |
|
|
4 033 |
|
|
3 857 |
|
|
|
22 551 |
|
|
22 655 |
|
|
35 013 |
|
|
23 662 |
|
| 1 |
On 8 June 2020, MTN Nigeria issued commercial paper with a face value of NGN20 billion (R881 million) for 182 days and NGN80 billion (R3 460 million) for 270 days. |
|
|
|
2019
Rm |
|
|
|
|
| Uncertain tax exposures |
|
1 796 |
1 959 |
| Legal and regulatory matters |
|
2 035 |
2 280 |
|
|
3 831 |
4 239 |
Uncertain tax exposures
The Group operates in numerous tax jurisdictions and the Group’s interpretation and
application of the various tax rules applied in direct and indirect tax filings may result
in disputes between the Group and the relevant tax authority. The outcome of such
disputes may not be favourable to the Group. At 31 December 2020, there were a
number of tax disputes ongoing in various of the Group’s operating entities. The most
significant matter relates to a transfer pricing dispute which the Group is contesting
with the South African Revenue Service that relates to the 2009 to 2012 tax years.
Based on internal and external legal and technical advice obtained, the Group remains
confident that it has a robust legal case to contest the exposure.
Legal and regulatory matters
The Group is involved in various legal and regulatory matters, the outcome of which
may not be favourable to the Group and none of which are considered individually
material.
The Group has applied its judgement and has recognised liabilities based on whether
additional amounts will be payable and has included contingent liabilities where
economic outflows are considered possible but not probable. |
|
|
|
|
|
Closing rates |
Average rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Foreign currency to South African rand: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| United States dollar |
US$ |
|
|
14,68 |
13,98 |
16,50 |
14,44 |
| South African rand to foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nigerian naira |
NGN |
|
|
27,28 |
26,09 |
23,24 |
25,05 |
| Iranian rial1 |
IRR |
|
|
17 458,88 |
8 120,61 |
10 117,96 |
7 013,39 |
| Ghanaian cedi |
GHS |
|
|
0,40 |
0,41 |
0,35 |
0,38 |
| Cameroon Communauté Financière Africaine franc |
XAF |
|
|
36,42 |
41,78 |
34,69 |
40,57 |
| Côte d’lvoire Communauté Financière Africaine franc |
CFA |
|
|
36,47 |
41,78 |
34,76 |
40,57 |
| Ugandan shilling |
UGX |
|
|
249,19 |
262,14 |
225,45 |
256,68 |
| Syrian pound |
SYP |
|
|
85,57 |
31,33 |
50,53 |
30,27 |
| Sudanese pound |
SDG |
|
|
3,76 |
3,23 |
3,32 |
3,14 |
The Group’s functional and presentation currency is rand. The weakening of the
closing rate of the rand against the functional currencies of the Group’s
largest operations contributed to the increase in consolidated assets and liabilities
and the resulting foreign currency translation reserve increase of R4 453 million
(2019: R4 415 million reduction) for the year.
Net investment hedges
The Group hedges a designated portion of its dollar net assets in MTN Dubai for forex
exposure arising between the US$ and ZAR as part of the Group’s risk management
objectives. The Group designated external borrowings (Eurobonds) denominated in
US$ held by MTN (Mauritius) Investments Limited with a value of R27,7 billion
(2019: R25,8 billion). For the period of the hedge relationship, foreign exchange
movements on these hedging instruments are recognised in other comprehensive
income as part of the foreign currency translation reserve (FCTR), offsetting the
exchange differences recognised in other comprehensive income, arising on
translation of the designated dollar net assets of MTN Dubai to ZAR. The cumulative
forex movement recognised in other comprehensive income will only be reclassified to
profit or loss upon loss of control of MTN Dubai. There was no hedge ineffectiveness
recognised in profit or loss during the current or prior year. |
|
On 31 December 2019 the Group concluded an agreement to dispose of its 49% equity
holdings in Ghana InterCo and Uganda InterCo to AT Sher Netherlands Cooperatief
U.A. (ATC). The Uganda InterCo transaction closed on 21 February 2020 for cash
proceeds of $140 million (R2,2 billion1) and realised a profit of R1,3 billion, inclusive of
FCTR gains of R112 million reclassified to profit or loss on disposal. The Ghana Interco
transaction closed on 18 March 2020 for cash proceeds of US$384 million
(R6,6 billion1) and realised a profit of R4,8 billion, after inclusion of FCTR losses of
R1,8 billion reclassified to profit or loss on disposal.
| 1 |
Translated at the effective date of sale. Cash proceeds per the statement of cash flows are translated at
the spot rate on the date of receipt of the proceeds. |
|
|
On 7 October 2020 the Group disposed of 8% shareholding in MTN Zambia taking the
Group’s effective shareholding for accounting purposes from 97,8% to 89,8%. The
proceeds from the disposal amounted to ZMK287 million (R238 million) and realised a
net gain of R180 million recognised in equity as a transaction with non-controlling
interests. |
|
MTN Syria
In May 2020, the Group committed to a plan to sell MTN Syria to Teleinvest Limited
(TeleInvest), which is the 25% non-controlling shareholder in MTN Syria. Accordingly,
as at 31 December 2020, MTN Syria’s assets and liabilities have been presented as
held for sale due to the Group concluding that the sale was considered to be highly
probable. At 31 December 2020, the Group expected the sale to be concluded within
2021. An impairment loss of R1,1 billion was recognised in profit or loss for the period
due to writing down the carrying amount of the disposal group to its fair value less
costs to sell. MTN Syria was presented as part of the MENA cluster in the segment
information (note 8).
Subsequent to the end of the reporting period, on 25 February 2021, the appointment
of the judicial guardian has significantly reduced the Group’s power to direct
MTN Syria’s relevant activities and therefore, its control over MTN Syria. The Group is
still in the process of understanding its rights and obligations under the judicial
arrangement but to the extent that control is concluded to have been lost, the Group
will derecognise its 75% equity interest in and loans receivable from MTN Syria,
amounting to R955 million at 31 December 2020. In addition, the Group will reclassify
accumulated foreign currency translation losses of R5,1 billion to profit or loss in line
with the accounting policy. On loss of control, the Group will measure its equity interest
in and loans receivable from MTN Syria at fair value.
Included in the 2020 Group results is R2 295 million revenue (1,3% of the Group’s total
revenue) and R574 million CODM EBITDA1 (0,8% of Group’s total CODM EBITDA)
relating to MTN Syria. These amounts exclude the impact of hyperinflation.
Belgacom International Carrier Services (BICS)
The Group has been in discussions regarding a potential sale of its shareholding in
BICS for some time as the investment in associate was not considered a strategic
investment. BICS was accordingly classified as a non-current asset held for sale on
5 August 2020. An impairment loss of R397 million after writing down the carrying
amount of the non-current asset held for sale to its fair value less costs to sell has
been recognised in profit or loss.
Following year-end, the Group concluded an agreement to sell, and fully exited, its
20% investment in BICS. The transaction closed in February 2021 and the Group
received net cash proceeds of EUR99,1 million (R1,8 billion2) and realised a profit of
approximately R1,2 billion, mainly comprising of reclassified FCTR gains which will
form part of EPS, with no impact on HEPS, equity and cash flows.
| 1 |
CODM EBITDA is defined in note 8. |
| 2 |
Translated at the effective date of sale. |
The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that have been reclassified to noncurrent assets held for sale were:
|
|
|
| MTN Syria |
|
| Property, plant and equipment |
1 036 |
| Right-of-use assets |
131 |
| Intangible assets |
380 |
| Trade receivables and other current assets |
588 |
| Cash and cash equivalents |
124 |
| Total assets |
2 259 |
| BICS |
|
| Interest in associate |
1 747 |
| Other |
10 |
| Non-current assets held for sale |
4 016 |
| MTN Syria |
|
| Deferred tax and other non-current liabilities |
346 |
| Current liabilities |
738 |
| Total liabilities |
1 084 |
| Net carrying amount of assets held for sale |
2 932 |
|
|
|
| 22.1 |
MTN Sudan |
| |
On 21 February 2021, the Central Bank of Sudan devalued the official Sudanese
exchange rate to US$ 1: SDG 375,08, which translates to an exchange rate of
approximately ZAR 1: SDG 25,57. The devaluation brought the official rates in line with
parallel market rates and is an effort to eliminate parallel market activity.
As Sudan is a hyperinflationary economy, the Group translates MTN Sudan’s results
at the closing exchange rate. The devaluation of the Sudanese Pound will result in
lower earnings consolidated from MTN Sudan based on the closing rate, a reduction
in net assets consolidated and a resulting lower equity in the form of higher foreign
currency translation losses. |
|
|
| 23.1 |
Release of foreign currency translation reserves |
| |
The Group implemented a voluntary accounting policy change relating to the release of FCTR.
In the first quarter of 2019, the Group announced that it will be optimising its portfolio
through an asset realisation programme aimed at simplifying the Group, reducing risk
and improving shareholder returns and in March 2020 the Group announced that this
programme has been further expanded. The strategic intent to dispose of certain
investments in subsidiaries and associates over the medium term has resulted in a
review of the most appropriate approach in accounting for these disposals.
IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates (IAS 21) requires that on the
disposal of a foreign operation, the cumulative amount of the exchange differences
relating to that foreign operation, recognised in other comprehensive income and
accumulated in the FCTR in equity, shall be reclassified from equity to profit or loss as
a reclassification adjustment when the gain or loss on disposal is recognised. Two
accepted methods exist for recycling FCTR where the investments are held by an
intermediate parent with a different functional currency than the entity disposed of
and the ultimate parent. These methods that are referred to as part of the basis for
conclusions (BC 35 – BC 39) in IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign
Operation are as follows:
- Step-by-step method – FCTR is recycled based on the appreciation or devaluation
in the functional currency of the investment disposed of against the functional
currency of the intermediate parent and translated into the functional currency of
the ultimate parent.
- Direct method – FCTR is recycled based on the appreciation or devaluation in the
functional currency of the investment disposed of against the functional currency
of the ultimate reporting entity.
The Group has historically applied the step-by-step method on disposals to date. The
functional currencies of some of the Group’s intermediate holding companies are US
dollar and, as a result, the FCTR reclassified on the step-by-step approach is
determined based on the appreciation or devaluation of the currencies of the entities
disposed of against the US dollar and translated into the functional currency of the
ultimate parent. As the Group’s functional and presentation currency is ZAR and the
FCTR is based on the appreciation or devaluation of the ZAR against the equity of the
underlying operations in the Group, the direct method provides a more reliable and
relevant view of the gain or loss realised in the context of the Group’s ZAR functional
currency. The Group has accordingly changed its accounting policy on the
reclassification of FCTR on disposal of foreign operations held by an intermediate
parent where the functional currency of the foreign operation and intermediate
parent is different to that of the ultimate parent from the step-by-step method to the
direct method.
This change in accounting policy impacted the FCTR gains and losses reclassified to profit
or loss in the current year on disposal of the Group’s investments in associates, Ghana
InterCo and Uganda InterCo, and in the prior years on disposal of the Group’s interests in
foreign operations, as disclosed below:
Impacts on the financial statements
| Condensed consolidated income statement (extract) |
2019
Rm |
|
|
|
| Gain on disposal/dilution of investment in joint ventures and associates |
831 |
– |
| Other income |
– |
137 |
| Operating profit |
831 |
137 |
| Profit before tax |
831 |
137 |
| Income tax expense |
– |
– |
| Profit after tax |
831 |
137 |
| Attributable to: |
|
|
| Equity holdings of the company |
831 |
137 |
| Non-controlling interests |
– |
– |
|
|
|
|
| Condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income (extract) |
2019 Rm |
|
|
|
| Reclassification of foreign currency translation differences on loss of control and joint control |
(831) |
(137) |
| Total comprehensive income for the year |
– |
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Condensed consolidated statement of financial position (extract) |
31 December
2019
Rm |
1 January
2019
Rm |
|
|
|
|
| Retained earnings |
3 116 |
2 285 |
2 148 |
| Other reserves |
(3 116) |
(2 285) |
(2 148) |
| Total equity |
– |
– |
– |
The impact of the change in policy on earnings per share is a 46 cents increase
(2019: 7 cents increase) and diluted earnings a 46 cents increase (2019: 7 cents
increase). The change in accounting policy had no impact on headline earnings or
cash flows in the current or prior comparative year. |