Risk management
Management of the Group is responsible for the on-theground
implementation of adequate and effective internal
control mechanisms.
Risk management mechanisms
As a company that operates in and understands emerging
markets, MTN believes that risk management is fundamental
to effective corporate governance and the development of a
sustainable business. The group has adopted a risk philosophy
that is aimed at maximising business success and shareholder
value by effectively balancing risk and reward.
MTN’s objective with risk management is to embed the process
into the day-to-day running of the business in a practical
manner. This involves continual pro-active identification and
understanding of risk factors and events that may impact
business objectives, development of appropriate response
strategies, and continual monitoring and reporting. This is done
through the implementation of various risk management and
governance mechanisms. These include:
- Measuring the effective implementation by the various
operations’ chief executives and other management of
corporate governance measures.
- Embedding risk management procedures into day-to-day
activities such as business planning, operational reviews,
projects etc.
- Business risk management functions in most operations
to facilitate, co-ordinate and monitor the effective
implementation of risk management mechanisms.
- Assurance from internal audit on the internal control
environment.
- Audit and risk committees in all operations.
- Group oversight.
Roles and responsibilities for risk management and
internal control
Group board of directors
The Group board of directors is ultimately responsible for
oversight of proper risk management and internal control
mechanisms.
Sub-committee oversight
The Group board is supported by two sub-committees, namely
the Group audit committee and the Group risk management
and compliance committee. The Group audit committee is
the oversight body for the implementation of adequate and
effective internal control mechanisms in the Group. The Group
risk management and compliance committee is the oversight body for risk management in the Group. It sets and approves
the risk management framework, and reviews the overall
effectiveness of risk management structures and response
strategies. At a lower level, each operating company has its
own audit and risk committee which is a sub-committee
of the board of directors of that operating company. These
committees are chaired by independent non-executive
directors and essentially mirror on a lower level the role of
the Group audit committee and Group risk management and
compliance committee. These committees report to the Group
committees on a regular basis to ensure oversight from a
Group perspective.
Management
Management of the Group is responsible for the on-theground
implementation of adequate and effective internal
control mechanisms. Management is represented at a Group
level by the Group executive committee, headed by the Group
president and chief executive officer, and at an operating
company level by the chief executive officer of each operating
company.
Independent business risk management function
Business risk management is an independent function
responsible for the disciplines of enterprise risk management,
internal audit and fraud risk management. It is headed by a
Group executive who reports directly to the Group president
and chief executive officer and has direct access to and regular
meetings with the chairpersons of the Group audit committee
and Group risk management and compliance committee.
The focus of the Group business risk management function is to provide support and guidance and to ensure that the
maturity of risk management practices in all operations is
improved. This is done through the implementation of a set of
maturity models which guide the business risk management
functions in the operations. MTN now has business risk
management functions in all but two of its operations with
oversight from the Group business risk management function.
We plan to introduce business risk management functions in
the two outstanding operations in due course. As a result of
management's efforts, the average maturity level of
MTN's business risk disciplines has improved by more than
50% during 2008 and the goal is to continue this trend
during 2009. MTN now has in excess of 100 risk and internal
audit specialists employed in these functions.
Enterprise risk management
As far as enterprise risk management is concerned, the business
risk management function is responsible for ensuring the
existence of an effective framework for risk management and
driving the implementation of this framework throughout the
Group. This is done by assisting and educating management
on the topic and by ensuring effective reporting and escalation
of risks.
The process of risk management in the Group is guided
by a risk framework which is based on best practice
risk management procedures. The Group business risk
management function, together with management, has the
mandate and responsibility of ensuring that adequate risk
management processes are implemented in all areas of the
business in line with the risk framework.
Risk appetite
MTN's risk appetite is determined by type of risk. This allows for
a more controlled way of managing risk levels. Aggregation of
total risk is done qualitatively and the Group risk management
and compliance committee assesses the acceptability of
MTN's consolidated risk profile. A project to expand the Group
delegation of authority to include escalation and approval of
risk response strategies is under way.
Insurance and risk transfer
MTN has in place a comprehensive insurance programme
which covers perils such as material damage/business
interruption, political risk, public liability, directors' and officers'
liability, crime and professional indemnity. The limits of
indemnity for these covers have been structured to optimise
the balance between maximum potential loss and containing
premiums. MTN also believes that risk retention and selfinsurance
are necessary to keep premiums at reasonable
levels and show commitment towards risk management.
MTN's risk retention levels differ from policy to policy but
range between USD150 000 and USD3 000 000.
Fraud risk management
The business risk management function is responsible
for assessing fraud risk across the Group and driving the
implementation of fraud prevention activities, which include
whistleblowing processes. Business risk management is
also responsible for detecting and investigating fraud.
The implementation of fraud prevention mechanisms in
the Group remains a priority. There was an increase in the
number of fraud and theft cases reported in 2008. We believe
that was not due to an increase in fraud and theft activities but was mainly due to the implementation of improved
fraud prevention and detection mechanisms which included
the implementation of a Group-wide fraud incidents register,
conducting fraud risk assessments in most operations
and the implementation of improved whistleblowing
mechanisms. The overall value of fraud and theft incidents
uncovered to date is not material.
In 2009 we will focus on the following inherent fraud risk
categories from both a fraud risk and internal audit point of
view:
- Procurement – conflict of interest and collusion with
suppliers.
- Asset and inventory theft.
- Site acquisition and construction.
- Manipulation of billing data.
- Bribery and corruption.
Internal audit
The business risk management function has a separate internal
audit discipline which is responsible for providing independent
internal audit assurance to the Group. The independence of the
internal audit discipline is maintained by ensuring that internal
audit employees are not involved in risk management activities
and by virtue of the fact that internal audit work is ultimately
governed by the Group audit committee.
Internal audit activity in the Group increased significantly
during 2008. This was a result of the creation of an internal
audit presence in operations that previously did not have
full-time audit functions and the implementation of an internal
audit assurance partnership with one of the ‘Big 4’ audit firms.
For 2009, more than 110 000 internal audit hours are planned
compared to 94 000 for 2008. The distribution of these hours in
the various core business areas can be illustrated as follows:
| Planned audit hours (core business areas) |
 |
The split of audit hours planned for 2009 between the various
country operations is illustrated as follows:
| Planned audit hours (countries) |
 |
Not only was there a significant increase in internal audit
activity during 2008 but there was also an improvement in the
maturity and quality of internal audit assurance. This was as a
result of the implementation of extensive training of internal
audit staff and adoption of improved methodologies and
reporting.
Principal risks

The board believes that management has identified the core
risks in relation to the Group. These, as displayed in the graphic
above, are categorised into operational, telecoms sector,
strategy and macro-economic risks.
MTN’s principal risks fall mainly into the macro-economic and
telecoms sector categories.
Two factors that could adversely affect MTN’s revenue and
market share are the potential impact of the world economic downturn on emerging markets and increased competition
in these markets. The impact of the economic downturn
is difficult to quantify, but is a significant risk to the Group.
A number of European operators are already showing signs
of a slowdown but the impact on our markets to date has not
been significant and, as mentioned in the Group president
and CEO’s report, MTN remains cautiously optimistic about
2009. Competition in emerging markets has increased
significantly over the past year and is expected to accelerate
as major European and Middle Eastern operators expand into the developing markets. MTN believes that its innovative
marketing and product delivery strategies will manage the
impact of these factors. MTN’s latest results are evidence of
this. Innovations like the MTN Zone dynamic tariffing offering
have done particularly well and have positioned us well in a
number of countries.
The Group operates in environments which can, and
do, present challenges from a political and regulatory
perspective. These challenges are often beyond
MTN's control and any resulting inability to operate
successfully in these countries as a consequence of these
challenges could have a significantly negative impact on the
Group. MTN operates in varying regulatory environments -
some of which are immature. The result is often regulations
that are uncertain or inconsistent. MTN is confident that
its risk management strategies to respond to these risks
have prevented any significant negative impact to the
Group so far. These strategies include strict compliance
with regulations, physical security measures, risk transfer
and insurance strategies and good corporate citizenship.
The political situation in some of the countries we operate
in continues to be challenging. As a result, the Group has
created a crisis operations centre based at its head office to
assist the Group and its operations to maximise the safety of
our staff, protect our infrastructure and respond pro-actively
to incidents. Turmoil in Afghanistan during 2008 resulted
in some infrastructure losses for MTN and other mobile
operators. Tragically one MTN employee and his family were
killed during an attack in Afghanistan.
In just over two years, MTN's network in Iran has achieved
phenomenal subscriber growth, bringing subscriber numbers
to the third highest in the Group. The impact of economic
sanctions on certain of the countries in which we operate is still
seen as a risk to the Group, particularly from a supply chain and
economic growth point of view.
The impact of the current economic crisis on the currencies
of emerging markets remains a risk to the Group. This risk is
managed through our centralised Treasury function with the
implementation of various mechanisms and procedures to
respond to this risk as far as it is within MTN's control.
Key operational risks in the Group include network
performance in certain countries. Significant focus has been
placed on the mitigation of this risk over the last year, with
extensive investment in our networks to increase redundancy,
increase network availability and reduce congestion. A key
challenge to the Group remains adaptation to the skills
required for the new-generation networks and furthermore
to have the right resources to keep up with the expected
strong growth in the business. The implementation of the
MTN Academy will help address these needs.
The repatriation of earnings from most of the Group’s
operations has continued as planned. There are, however, some
isolated cases where problems have been experienced. In these
cases MTN has engaged the relevant authorities in order to
resolve the issues.
|